Have you ever noticed that when you are skeptical of climate change debating points that you are immediately called into check, called ignorant or uneducated? Why is that? Why are we told to question authority and learn to think for ourselves but forced to have climate science shoved down our throats? You see, personally, I question everything, isn't that what we are supposed to do, and when someone gives an answer which doesn't seem to jive we should ask more questions, not merely go to Google Search to read NEWS Articles, or hope to find what we are looking for. After all, often the reality is somewhere buried under a load of debris.
Okay so, perhaps like you, I know when something smells rotten, and human science has been hijacked, distorted and I wonder if we can ever trust it again. Adding fuel to the fire doesn't do any good, or CO2 from wildfires, caused by lightning and now we are told the lightning will increase therefore we can count the CO2 from wildfires as also caused by human activity, it never ends and seems there is an abundance of BS out there. Most recently, we even have people now telling us that "Inequality" is caused and will increase due to Global Warming -- which used to be defined as mankind's CO2 causing climate to warm -- but they've conveniently changed definitions, arguments or whatever to keep it going, keep the funding, and keep climate soldiers out here online shouting down any reality check which comes forth. Now it's not called Global Warming any longer - they call it climate change which no one can legitimately deny because the climate is always changing.
One thing that concerns me about "The Data" used to prove this theory correct is that the distribution of temperature sensors is skewed with too many sensors near urban heat islands. I think this is well-known and they are trying to correct the problem. Satellites can do it best. One important satellite to do this was lost on launch a couple years ago, it was to give us more accurate readings, since then NASA has put up another satellite, in conjunction with NOAA.
We are told that the temperatures have risen so far.8 degrees in 150-years, but you see there were not sensors everywhere back then, and yes we are correcting a problem that was considered to make the data questionable within the last 15-years. Then we will have data moving forward to see if the Earth is really warming up everywhere or if it is happening regionally, or changing the weather distribution. We should also be able to tell if it is from humankind's pollution distribution based on where the trade-winds and normal weather flows put that pollution. Think on this, Sincerely, Lance
26 November 2014 | Latest NewsScientists observe 'force field' protecting Earth from electron damage: 26 November 2014 | Latest NewsHelp researchers hunt ...
Thanks....
BalasHapus